Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120229
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 03 '20 at 23:39
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5675
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 96.9
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 184
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 505
52% 422 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit)
MSI(1462 284B) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 31.3
20% 27 fps
MRender 34.6
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 23.8
23% 29.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SATAIII 120GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 51 34 21 22 13 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.4% Poor
Read 107
Write 99.2
Mixed 105
SusWrite 28.8
19% 85 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 13.7
49% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 39.2
DQ Mixed 15.2
15% 23.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
55GB free
Firmware: CC4G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 41 26 13 12 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 74.7
Write 90
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 20.7
43% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 64 48 50 49 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 104
Write 105
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 54.4
63% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
223% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 89%
WD My Book 1170 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 1170
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 117 113 119 120 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 54.5
Write 31
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 110
75% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
38% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 58%
USB 3.0 3TB
1TB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 57 60 61 61 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.8% Below average
Read 70.7
Write 70.7
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 59.4
83% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 51%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
25GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 64 78 84 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 120
Write 108
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 76.1
116% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.3
120% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 59%
WD My Passport 0827 1TB
403GB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 57 60 61 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 108
Write 106
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 59.4
105% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 21.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 4.4
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 50.6
79% 50.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EX58-UD3R Builds (Compare 482 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback