Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150915
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateJul 28 '22 at 19:06
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770S-$92
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770S CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 97
2-Core 184
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 439
46% 371 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 310
HP(103C 094E) 512MB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 353.62
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB
870GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 52 12 139 48 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 426
Write 353
Mixed 310
SusWrite 72
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 12
49% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 89.5
DQ Mixed 28.9
41% 77 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 106%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 27 29 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 30
Write 23.7
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 27.5
20% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
206% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-052.A00LF Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.6% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback