PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 (all builds) |
Memory | 8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131003 |
Uptime | 6.2 Days |
Run Date | Mar 21 '20 at 05:14 |
Run Duration | 232 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
62.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Gigabyte(1458 3527) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
15.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$56
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 68 79 39 19 23 MB/s
|
30%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
79GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 73 81 40 19 24 MB/s
|
37.8%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
341GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 70 71 71 67 MB/s
|
47.5%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
487GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 84 82 83 75 MB/s
|
48.8%
Average
|
|||
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
0GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 1.2 4.8 5.1 3.1 MB/s
|
1.32%
Terrible
|
|||
USB 3.0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 121 123 124 124 MB/s
|
50.6%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.5%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 143x |
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 28x |
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 24x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 25x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 18x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $490 |