Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131003
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateMar 21 '20 at 05:14
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 53.4
2-Core 106
54% 82.8 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 275
30% 235 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Gigabyte(1458 3527) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 15.6
14% 17.8 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 17.9
Splatting 20.6
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$56
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 68 79 39 19 23 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30% Poor
Read 276
Write 209
Mixed 156
SusWrite 48.1
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 15.4
48% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 16.9
DQ Write 20.7
DQ Mixed 13.3
12% 17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
79GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 73 81 40 19 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 80.9
Write 64.1
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 50.7
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
341GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 70 71 71 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 96.2
Write 101
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 69.4
60% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
487GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 84 82 83 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 89.2
Write 74.4
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 80.7
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
2GB free
Firmware: CC32
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 65.3
Write 64.7
Mixed 48.7
44% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 75%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
0GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 1.2 4.8 5.1 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1.32% Terrible
Read 4.3
Write 0.5
Mixed 2.3
SusWrite 3.2
3% 2.58 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.32%
Great: 9%
USB 3.0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 121 123 124 124 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.6% Above average
Read 124
Write 116
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 122
143% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.5% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD5 Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback