Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-S2  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121019
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 24 '20 at 01:48
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Memory 26.2
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 92.7
30% 55.9 Pts
4-Core 80.7
8-Core 267
19% 174 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.2% Above average
Lighting 62
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 62.3
50% 63.2 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 65.5
Splatting 68
56% 68 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
19GB free
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 88 86 90 87 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 142
Write 103
Mixed 98.7
SusWrite 87.7
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 21.8
78% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 22.4
DQ Write 63.5
DQ Mixed 27.1
25% 37.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ES2OA60W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 26 16 37 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 9.5
Write 15.5
Mixed 11
SusWrite 26.1
11% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 46%
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
29GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 34 28 22 40 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 13.2
Write 32.7
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 31.2
18% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 51%
Toshiba MK5059GSXP 500GB-$50
45GB free
Firmware: GT001L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 51 47 52 48 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 61.5
Write 53
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 51.3
38% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
15GB free
Firmware: GG2OACY0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 50 47 52 48 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 59.7
Write 59.7
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 51.3
36% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 58%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
88GB free
Firmware: AX002J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 87 86 90 87 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 106
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 87.6
59% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 62%
Multiple Card Reader 16GB
11GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.9 4.8 4.1 4.9 4.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
4.1% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 2.7
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 4.7
8% 7.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.1%
Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
119GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.59% Terrible
Read 0.8
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.8
1% 0.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
25% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 1.59%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
22.7% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 278
14% 278 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-S2 Builds (Compare 897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2 - $59

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback