Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20080

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 9%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemLenovo 20080  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Inagua
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120503
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '22 at 19:26
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-60 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Memory 35.4
1-Core 13.8
2-Core 26.2
18% 25.1 Pts
4-Core 27.1
8-Core 25.6
4% 26.4 Pts
64-Core 26.8
2% 26.8 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6290
Legend(17AA 397C) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.4
0% 0.8 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 48 46 20 19 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 13.1
Write 39.6
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 28.9
18% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 51%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
7GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.8 4.2 4.3 4.4 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Read 20.1
Write 4
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 4.4
9% 8.45 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 2.7
6% 2.17 GB/s
Latency 225
18% 225 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20080 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20080

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback