Today's hottest deals

Samsung RC420/RC520/RC720

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung RC420/RC520/RC720  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RC420/RC520/RC720
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110328
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 17 '22 at 03:52
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
45.3% Average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 104
55% 85 Pts
4-Core 56
8-Core 145
11% 101 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ES2OA70K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 24 22 29 30 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.49% Terrible
Read 4
Write 3.5
Mixed 3.2
SusWrite 25.7
7% 9.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.49%
Great: 46%
USB Flash Memory 8GB
6GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.6 2.8 3.2 2.9 3.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 2.2
Mixed 4
SusWrite 3.2
7% 7.53 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 8%
Multiple Card Reader 32GB
30GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 8.5 5.8 6.5 6.5 6.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 17.9
Write 15.7
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 6.9
18% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 2.7
186% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-051.A00LF Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.3
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 5.3
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RC420/RC520/RC720 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RC420/RC520/RC720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback