Acer Aspire M7721

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics4.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire M7721  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer FX58M
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '15 at 10:12
Run Duration478 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 136
47% 103 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 389
38% 312 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 46% Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330
Sapphire(174B 3058) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4144
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
4.31% Terrible
Lighting 5.47
Reflection 6.92
Parallax 1.94
4% 4.78 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 4.65
4% 4.96 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.8% Average
Read 243
Write 181
Mixed 178
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 16.6
67% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 44.9
56% 99 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 101%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
420GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
48% Average
Read 83.3
Write 83.9
Mixed 58.6
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.32
84% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48%
Great: 59%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
286GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 70.9
Write 76.9
Mixed 56.1
51% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.17
82% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 63%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
184GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 53.8
Write 54.6
Mixed 43.4
38% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.3
80% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 51%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
165GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 78.4
Write 62.4
Mixed 49.1
47% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.19
51% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 55%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
293GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 27.9
Write 25.1
Mixed 26
34% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.38
83% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 48%
CT250BX1 00SSD1 250GB
233GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 28.4
Write 25.1
Mixed 26.5
34% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 5.98
4K Mixed 4.15
366% 5.31 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 58%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
213GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 27
Write 24.3
Mixed 23.6
32% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.25
71% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 44%
Seagate Desktop 1TB
90GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 24.9
Mixed 25.7
33% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.64
4K Mixed 0.49
109% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 21%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
3GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 23.4
Write 12.5
Mixed 14
19% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.42
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.66
72% 2.02 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 11%
Typical Aspire M7721 Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire M7721

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $364
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback