Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME B350-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B350-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory19.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '22 at 12:34
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 68.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 229
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 679
68% 552 Pts
64-Core 847
52% 847 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.4% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 96.5
52% 67.2 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 50
50% 61.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,181
Write 1,839
Mixed 1,445
405% 1,822 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 65.4
215% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 813
DQ Write 513
DQ Mixed 701
512% 675 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 296%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
994GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2.7 2.7 3.7 2.2 3.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 88.5
Write 9
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 2.9
24% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D26BFSC.8FBD2 BL8G26C16U4W.8FD BLS4G4D26BFSC.8FBD2 BL8G26C16U4W.8FD 24GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.3% Excellent
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 30.5
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 21.7
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B350-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350-PLUS - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback