Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory32.8 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime8.5 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 19:10
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 218
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 666
65% 536 Pts
64-Core 667
41% 667 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74% Very good
Lighting 92.9
Reflection 89.8
Parallax 84.1
76% 88.9 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 79.8
Splatting 72.2
70% 88.6 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SH920 2.5 7MM 512GB
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010BL00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 390 284 360 358 356 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 397
Mixed 128
SusWrite 337
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 31.5
117% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 241
203% 297 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 92%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 0.4 1.2 0.7 0.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 89.1
Write 92.6
Mixed 93
SusWrite 0.9
52% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26%
Great: 63%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
2TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 39.8
Write 40.4
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 40.8
52% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.7
312% 3.27 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 0.6
342% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-4GRKD G.SKILL F4-3200C16-4GRKD 40GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $816
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback