Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics94.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '21 at 20:39
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$170
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 77.8
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 954
90% 747 Pts
64-Core 1436
89% 1436 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.7% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 136
Parallax 124
96% 126 fps
MRender 95.7
Gravity 129
Splatting 114
93% 113 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 198 194 195 192 197 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 447
Write 231
Mixed 247
SusWrite 199
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 15
84% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 99.9
DQ Mixed 23.2
41% 81.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 74%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
129GB free
Firmware: 525ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 148 147 161 161 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 461
Write 133
Mixed 203
SusWrite 151
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 22.9
87% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 61.9
DQ Mixed 73.6
64% 98.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 1TB
760GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 99 102 103 102 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 97.6
Write 72.3
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 99.1
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 63%
CT250BX1 00SSD1 250GB
59GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 36
Write 35.1
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 35.2
48% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 11.5
898% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 10.4
DQ Write 14.2
DQ Mixed 11.8
923% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 58%
SSD2SC48 0G1CS1754D117-51 480GB
211GB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 83 68 114 120 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 256
Write 246
Mixed 215
SusWrite 95.9
266% 203 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 20
1,574% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17.8
DQ Write 26.3
DQ Mixed 20.5
1,658% 21.5 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 137%
Great: 137%
ADATA SU 635 240GB
155GB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 102 89 114 120 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
137% Outstanding
Read 215
Write 224
Mixed 210
SusWrite 103
252% 188 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 18.2
1,560% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 26.1
DQ Mixed 18.5
1,572% 19.8 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
68.2% Good
MC Read 30
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 25.5
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 25
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 26.7
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $714
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback