MSI B250 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A64
MotherboardMSI B250 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64)  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170727
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 28 '20 at 00:23
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 217
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 434
57% 430 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (62 fps cap detected)
50.4% Above average
Lighting 62.3
Reflection 61.4
Parallax 53.5
51% 59.1 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 58.3
Splatting 61.6
50% 60.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
514GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1070 1241 1213 1126 1136 1134 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2,126
Write 2100
Mixed 1,474
SusWrite 1,153
384% 1,713 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 81.4
272% 95.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,366
DQ Write 1,136
DQ Mixed 1,246
935% 1,250 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 295%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
160GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 476 474 477 423 267 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 474
Mixed 442
SusWrite 432
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 61.1
207% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 127%
Great: 129%
USB3.0 60GB
42GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 217 215 218 217 174 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.4% Average
Read 378
Write 202
Mixed 212
SusWrite 209
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 8.7
52% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 57.1
DQ Write 50.4
DQ Mixed 10.2
20% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 45%
MB4000GCWLV 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: HPG4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 166 165 165 165 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 159
Mixed 88
SusWrite 165
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
179% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 98%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 90 92 94 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 69.5
Write 78.7
Mixed 74
SusWrite 93.8
59% 79 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
185% 2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 92%
USB3.0 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 108
Write 103
Mixed 66
SusWrite 102
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FDD2 M378A5244CB0-CRC 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FDD2 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.8% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 24.3
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 22.8
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B250 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64) Builds (Compare 403 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B250 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback