HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1842 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '20 at 13:04
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 176
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 410
38% 320 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 86DC) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 14.3
15% 15.5 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 20.2
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 421 439 443 378 377 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 432
Mixed 414
SusWrite 393
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 36.2
114% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 291
239% 340 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 125%
USB3.0 60GB
39GB free
Firmware: 8105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 70 69 67 69 68 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.9% Below average
Read 320
Write 62.5
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 67.5
29% 136 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 17.9
66% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 70.5
DQ Write 53.9
DQ Mixed 55.1
43% 59.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 45%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
480GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 166 167 168 168 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 78
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 163
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 19.4
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback