MSI B250 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A64
MotherboardMSI B250 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64)  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170727
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJun 19 '22 at 17:58
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 68%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
67% Good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 223
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 412
39% 324 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (66 fps cap detected)
52.2% Above average
Lighting 64.1
Reflection 65.8
Parallax 60.4
52% 63.4 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 65.7
Splatting 60.5
52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 869 654 599 533 513 480 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 2,185
Write 1,637
Mixed 1531
SusWrite 608
332% 1,490 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 67.9
232% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 1,234
DQ Write 844
DQ Mixed 1,064
787% 1,047 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 243%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
283GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 403 425 398 443 450 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 384
Write 318
Mixed 384
SusWrite 399
84% 371 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 57.4
162% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 359
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 108%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
2TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 142 142 142 142 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 111
Write 139
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 142
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
3% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 17%
MB4000GCWLV 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: HPG4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 163 165 165 165 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 164
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 164
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 98%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37
2.5TB free
Firmware: MKAONS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 158 158 156 158 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 146
Write 146
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 157
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 87%
LEXAR JUMPDRIVE SECURE 0GB
0GB free, PID a430
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 6.5
Write 5.2
Mixed 5.2
7% 5.63 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 1.27 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FDD2 M378A5244CB0-CRC 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FDD2 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 24.2
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 22.6
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 73%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B250 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64) Builds (Compare 404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B250 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $649
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback