MSI B250 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A64
MotherboardMSI B250 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64)  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170727
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 25 '23 at 02:34
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 198
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 279
36% 273 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (66 fps cap detected)
53% Above average
Lighting 65.3
Reflection 66.3
Parallax 61.4
53% 64.3 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 65.8
Splatting 61.3
53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 522 299 321 327 319 310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1668
Write 1,526
Mixed 1,078
SusWrite 350
258% 1,156 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 49.8
156% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 792
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 497
386% 543 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 162%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
329GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 329 298 380 377 383 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 394
Write 362
Mixed 362
SusWrite 332
82% 362 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 36.1
125% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 338
257% 348 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 147 149 149 151 151 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 118
Write 131
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 149
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
3% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 17%
MB4000GCWLV 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: HPG4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 144 143 145 145 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 143
Write 114
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 144
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 98%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: MKAONS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 139 139 141 142 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
77% Very good
Read 129
Write 126
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 139
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FDD2 M378A5244CB0-CRC 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FDD2 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.6% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 23.1
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 20.5
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B250 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64) Builds (Compare 404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B250 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $649
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback