HP 500-210ea

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP 500-210ea (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory	8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140205
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 24 '19 at 09:41
Run Duration	291 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$41 49,509 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Memory 77.5 1-Core 81.6 2-Core 153 62% 104 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 212 28% 209 Pts	64-Core 221 14% 221 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz) 64,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 2AF7) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	3.38% Terrible	Lighting 3.33 Reflection 5.38 Parallax 1.66 3% 3.46 fps	MRender 6.52 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 7.57 5% 5.49 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.38% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 101 94 92 90 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 108 Write 96.5 Mixed 72.3 SusWrite 86.9 67% 91 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 114%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 499GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.2 5.1 5.1 5.2 5.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.01% Terrible	Read 24.8 Write 20.2 Mixed 23 SusWrite 5.2 14% 18.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.6 180% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.01% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 303GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.2 5 5.1 5.2 5.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.06% Terrible	Read 24.8 Write 14.3 Mixed 20 SusWrite 5.3 12% 16.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.5 165% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.06% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB 825 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 5TB free Firmware: 0511 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.2 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	8.71% Terrible	Read 23 Write 21.2 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 5.2 14% 18.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.7 232% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 8.71% Great: 89%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 166GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 85 78 80 83 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 35.2 Write 83.2 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 80.8 51% 68.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.5 178% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 92%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 6TB 120 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4TB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5 5 4.9 5 5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 20.5 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 5.1 24% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 132% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 83%
WD My Book 1230 6TB 1,283 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1TB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5 4.9 5 4.9 6.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 23.5 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 5.2 26% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 68%
SanDisk Ultra 125GB 1,024 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 116GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 9.8 11 13 21 23 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	26.5% Poor	Read 134 Write 40 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 15.7 57% 55.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 2.3 122% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 35%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB 1,261 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2TB free, PID 6125 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5 4.9 5 5 5.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 29.3 Write 20.7 Mixed 21 SusWrite 5.1 24% 19 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 68%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 1.5TB free, PID 2339 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 30.5 Write 20.3 Mixed 21 29% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 17%
Hitachi HCS5C2020ALA632 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 1.5TB free, PID 2339 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.2% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 24.2 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 0 25% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 10%
WDC WD64 00AAKS-22A7B0 640GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 450GB free, PID 2339 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 1.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	9.21% Terrible	Read 29.7 Write 20.8 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 0.7 23% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.21% Great: 22%
WDC WD10 EZRX-00L4HB0 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 869GB free, PID 2339 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.1 6.8 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 31 Write 21.3 Mixed 23 SusWrite 4.8 25% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.M16 Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 16GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.2% Above average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 16.7 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 15.8 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 85.3 47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 500-210ea Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: HP 500-210ea

CPU
Core i3-4130Intel $41Bench 52%, 49,509 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	1x

RAM
HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 29%, 2,350 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $41

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

HP 500-210ea

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: HP 500-210ea

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)