Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory57 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 14:02
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$138
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 287
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,005
96% 791 Pts
64-Core 1,450
90% 1,450 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
Sapphire(1DA2 E421) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Lighting 76.6
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 100
62% 81.8 fps
MRender 53.8
Gravity 77.8
Splatting 44.5
47% 58.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$331
757GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1258 713 788 848 623 749 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 734
Write 2,431
Mixed 609
SusWrite 830
262% 1,151 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 55.7
219% 89.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,267
DQ Write 832
DQ Mixed 909
716% 1,003 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 193%
Great: 500%
Amd-raid Array 1 8TB
877GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 430 434 430 431 431 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 434
Write 435
Mixed 366
SusWrite 428
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 14.1
60% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 98.1
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 112
90% 123 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 919%
Sabrent Rocket Q4 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: RKT40Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3291 3298 3288 3319 3334 3290 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
415% Outstanding
Read 1,769
Write 2,637
Mixed 1,786
SusWrite 3,303
540% 2,374 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 88.4
292% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,358
DQ Write 962
DQ Mixed 1,120
847% 1,147 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 415%
Great: 421%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
253GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 61 64 63 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 65.2
Write 67.2
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 61.2
88% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.7
214% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 59%
WD My Book 1230 6TB
575GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 163 163 161 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68% Good
Read 162
Write 160
Mixed 106
SusWrite 162
199% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
140% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 68%
Great: 68%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 118 118 117 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 122
Write 112
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 117
146% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 0.8
399% 4.23 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 0.6
413% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
93% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.5
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 39
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 93%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $894
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback