Today's hottest deals

HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100712
Uptime2 Days
Run DateNov 20 '18 at 16:20
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 65
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 150
57% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 193
27% 197 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210
Device(1B0A 9045) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.15% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.46 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.15%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 191 187 184 187 187 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.2% Above average
Read 239
Write 226
Mixed 226
SusWrite 190
50% 220 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 26.4
95% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 128
110% 159 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 123%
Hitachi HDS721064CLA332 640GB
483GB free
Firmware: JPGOA3GC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 107 107 107 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 119
Write 105
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 108
72% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 66%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
209GB free
Firmware: 1306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.7 5.7 6.5 6.9 8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 59%
WDC WD64 00AAKS-22A7B0 640GB
190GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 18.5
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 17.6
28% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 22%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
561GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.1 11 11 11 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 2C802C80 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 9801 9905471-011.A00LF 9801 9905471-02X.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.8% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 11.1
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM Builds (Compare 248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback