Today's hottest deals

Asus P7H55-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100818
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 16 '22 at 19:08
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 152
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 198
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Asus(1043 8446) 2GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.62
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 21.9
13% 18.6 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 16
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 128 122 126 141 160 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.6% Below average
Read 200
Write 101
Mixed 118
SusWrite 137
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 15.1
59% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 18
DQ Write 36.5
DQ Mixed 26.1
20% 26.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
567GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 130 43 54 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 146
Write 152
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 94.8
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
31.1% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 13.4
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55-M Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback