Asus M2A-VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M2A-VM  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100204
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateAug 27 '19 at 14:32
Run Duration339 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 42.7
2-Core 86.7
43% 66.6 Pts
4-Core 86.1
8-Core 88
12% 87.1 Pts
64-Core 86.7
5% 86.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
MSI(1462 2344) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.48% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 0.77
Parallax 1.91
0% 0.9 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 1.57
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.64 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.48%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.3 6.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 171
Write 166
Mixed 73
SusWrite 1.4
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 108%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 160GB-$34
51GB free
Firmware: GMBOA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
0.75% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 1.5
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 0.5
1% 1.25 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 0.75%
Great: 41%
Seagate ST3200822AS 200GB-$33
135GB free
Firmware: 3.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.8 1.3 1.3 1.3 2.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.79% Terrible
Read 25.4
Write 12.7
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 1.2
11% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 7.79%
Great: 34%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
312GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.1 1 1.1 1.1 1 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 1.5
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 1
1% 1.38 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 54%
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB
623GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.7 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
7.02% Terrible
Read 21.8
Write 27.4
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 1.4
12% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.4
146% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 65%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Mixed 0.2
0% 0.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 15%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
8GB free, PID 0738
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.8 2.3 2.1 0.6 0.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
8.78% Terrible
Read 24.3
Write 3.7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 1
7% 7.88 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2
127% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.78%
Great: 30%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
4GB free, PID 0738
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 1 1.8 1.6 2.3 2.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
7.91% Terrible
Read 24.1
Write 14
Mixed 17.6
SusWrite 1.5
17% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.8
110% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.91%
Great: 33%
Generic External 500GB
120GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.2 0.2 1.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Read 15.1
Write 12.3
Mixed 10.6
SusWrite 0.3
12% 9.57 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 21%
ST500DM0 02-1BD142 500GB
459GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
6.12% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 12.8
Mixed 12.6
SusWrite 0.2
13% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.12%
Great: 19%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.3
SusWrite 0.3
0% 0.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
16% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 10%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
3GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.3
SusWrite 0.3
0% 0.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
12% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2A-VM Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2A-VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $29
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback