Asrock HM55-MXM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock HM55-MXM  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 28 '19 at 10:40
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Memory 45.7
1-Core 20.8
2-Core 45.1
25% 37.2 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 97.6
13% 99.7 Pts
64-Core 83.3
5% 83.3 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M
Device(1B0A 9077) 1GB
CLim: 560 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.79% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 3.88
Parallax 2.91
3% 3.4 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 3.43
Splatting 2.48
3% 3.62 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.79%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 104 118 135 134 145 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.3% Below average
Read 157
Write 188
Mixed 153
SusWrite 128
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 14.6
53% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 57.8
DQ Mixed 31.5
27% 37.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 91%
ST1000DM 003-9YN162 1TB
717GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.3 2.7 2.8 2.5 2.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 5.5
Write 7.7
Mixed 10
SusWrite 2.8
9% 6.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
152% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 20%
IC35L120 AVV207-1 124GB
115GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 18 17 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.3% Very poor
Read 31
Write 24
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 17.3
31% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.93 MB/s
Generic External 500GB
35GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 19 19 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.53% Terrible
Read 29.1
Write 20.4
Mixed 16
SusWrite 18.3
27% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.53%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 5.9
14% 4.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HM55-MXM Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock HM55-MXM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $195
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback