Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJul 09 '22 at 07:08
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 127
53% 88 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 195
22% 174 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 8719) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.61% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 12.5
7% 9.7 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 8.6
6% 7.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.61%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 42 12 3.1 46 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 438
Write 271
Mixed 191
SusWrite 53.1
52% 238 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 16.9
4K Mixed 11.1
41% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 81.5
DQ Write 74.5
DQ Mixed 24.7
33% 60.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 55%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$99
433GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 96 96 95 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 95.1
Write 87.5
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 94.7
62% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.7% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 9.5
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback