Today's hottest deals

MSI H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A15
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15)  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180319
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateSep 01 '20 at 19:27
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 150
56% 98.8 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 239
29% 223 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 57.2
Parallax 76.9
0% 44.7 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 53.3
48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 36 58 40 47 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 54.7
Write 33.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 42.8
29% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.3% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 10.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 5.5
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15) Builds (Compare 2,872 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback