Today's hottest deals

Asus M4A78LT-M LX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M4A78LT-M LX  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '22 at 14:42
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
AM3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 82.8
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 87.2
48% 71.4 Pts
4-Core 83.8
8-Core 87.4
11% 85.6 Pts
64-Core 85.9
5% 85.9 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
Asus(1043 8388) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 0.8
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.9
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 48 18 16 31 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 85.1
Write 1.8
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 34
34% 44.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 60%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
8GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.2 7.2 6.9 7.3 7.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
8.37% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 7.2
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 7.1
14% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.5
90% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.37%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
29.8% Poor
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A78LT-M LX Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A78LT-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $102
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback