Biostar Z270GT8

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Biostar Z270GT8 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180528
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 30 '19 at 23:47
Run Duration	276 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Memory 91.3 1-Core 119 2-Core 230 83% 147 Pts	4-Core 453 8-Core 644 69% 548 Pts	64-Core 643 40% 643 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% PNY(196E 11BF) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.9% Below average	Lighting 39.6 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 37.5 32% 36.1 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 39.1 Splatting 37.1 31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1291 402 401 402 400 401 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	235% Outstanding	Read 1,626 Write 1,554 Mixed 991 SusWrite 550 264% 1,180 MB/s	4K Read 62.9 4K Write 164 4K Mixed 84.3 290% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,014 DQ Write 1,053 DQ Mixed 1,111 814% 1,059 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 235% Great: 302%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 803GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 425 459 466 466 466 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 411 Mixed 404 SusWrite 446 99% 442 MB/s	4K Read 43.7 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 60.8 210% 76.2 MB/s	DQ Read 355 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 334 249% 330 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 133%
Kingston SSDNow KC400 512GB-$180 2,804 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 476GB free Firmware: SAFM001B SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 426 458 468 469 471 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 446 Write 407 Mixed 303 SusWrite 448 90% 401 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 39.7 155% 60.1 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 68 122% 241 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 108%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 3TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 126 127 127 127 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.6% Above average	Read 126 Write 124 Mixed 74 SusWrite 126 151% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 52%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 2.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,530 Write 29.3 Mixed 61.5 1,261% 1,873 MB/s	4K Read 785 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 3.4 3,098% 264 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 52%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 3TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 118 Write 118 Mixed 44 113% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 52%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 2.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 119 Write 118 Mixed 67.8 126% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 89% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42 105,447 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.6% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 12.9 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.5 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270GT8 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar Z270GT8

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	2x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	2x
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	2x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 560 samples	1x
NVMe TOSHIBA 1024GBThnsn51t02dukBench 129%, 2,332 samples	1x
120 120GBKingmaxBench 24%, 14 samples	1x

RAM
CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 40,300 samples	2x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	1x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $154

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16