Gigabyte GA-B75N

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B75N (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121023
Uptime	9.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '17 at 23:38
Run Duration	254 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 92.5 1-Core 101 2-Core 213 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 520 56% 444 Pts	64-Core 520 32% 520 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34% Below average	Lighting 44.2 Reflection 32.2 Parallax 55.3 36% 43.9 fps	MRender 30.4 Gravity 38.5 Splatting 40 30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200 7,034 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 152GB free Firmware: R201 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3422529 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 5 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -86277303036574 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2050 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 36 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 48 60132687905 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3422529 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 5 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3422529 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3422529 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6915 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7123 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7123 (F2) Unknown 0 0 7390	55.6% Above average	Read 267 Write 210 Mixed 232 53% 236 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 17.9 85% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 74.3 77% 124 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 91%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2830 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1312 (B1) Unknown 98 98 13 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 47 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 41 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11169451635	74.5% Very good	Read 507 Write 345 Mixed 353 89% 402 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 30.8 4K Mixed 20.2 93% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 49.6 57% 97.9 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 118%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 26.3 Mixed 29.1 37% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 2.09 4K Mixed 0.15 78% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 52%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 764GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 26.3 Mixed 29.1 36% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.5 122% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 51%
SAMSUNG HD502IJ 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 401GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 25.6 Mixed 27.3 36% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.33 4K Mixed 0.45 97% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 551 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	53% Above average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 16.7 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B75N Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75N - $84

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	17x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	14x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	6x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	6x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	5x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	4x

SSD
CS900 250GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 2,686 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
Series SATA SSD 240GBVBench 70%, 4,398 samples	4x

RAM
CMA5-4GA01AAL01A00 2x8GBCorsairBench 57%, 11 samples	10x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 029E CML4GX3M1A1600C9 8GBUnknownBench 45%, 6 samples	6x
HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 8GBHynixBench 50%, 214 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $143

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16