Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '19 at 05:37
Run Duration	342 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 109 2-Core 214 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 529 55% 443 Pts	64-Core 547 34% 547 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 478 Write 442 Mixed 437 101% 452 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 66.2 4K Mixed 48.2 154% 50.7 MB/s	DQ Read 309 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 337 252% 333 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 931GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 202 201 203 200 204 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Read 479 Write 456 Mixed 422 SusWrite 208 88% 391 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 75.8 4K Mixed 48 154% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 340 252% 330 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 EVO mSAT 500GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 163GB free Firmware: RVT4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 198 199 199 198 200 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	72% Very good	Read 254 Write 241 Mixed 239 SusWrite 199 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 60.8 4K Mixed 43.8 138% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 96.7 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 126 100% 136 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 122%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$194 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 3TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 153 153 152 152 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 146 Write 145 Mixed 99.3 SusWrite 152 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1 214% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 98%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB 6,863 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 178GB free Firmware: 04.05G04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 98 98 98 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 97.8 Write 94.5 Mixed 74 SusWrite 97.5 67% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.2 235% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 80%
WD VelociRaptor 250GB-$35 3,015 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 158GB free Firmware: 04.06A00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 171 172 170 168 170 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 160 Mixed 105 SusWrite 164 109% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.7 355% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 111%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1.5TB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	21% Poor	Read 26 Write 27.8 Mixed 26.3 SusWrite 22.7 35% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.6 158% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 76%
ASMT 2105 250GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 3GB free, PID 0322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 302 Write 287 Mixed 267 364% 285 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 44.4 4K Mixed 33 2,732% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 31.5 DQ Write 62 DQ Mixed 35.9 3,447% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 276%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB 23,482 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 11GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 9 9.2 8.9 9.1 9.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	7.24% Terrible	Read 26.3 Write 8.7 Mixed 10.8 SusWrite 8.8 16% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.3 32% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.24% Great: 19%
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB 716 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 24GB free, PID 6362 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 20 21 21 21 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 27 Mixed 27 SusWrite 20.5 35% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.9 192% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 23%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 713 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2.5TB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 135 135 135 135 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 152 Write 114 Mixed 51 SusWrite 133 145% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 70%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 37GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 30 30 31 31 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 97.3 Write 18 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 30 47% 43.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 2.8 180% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 39%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 113 113 113 112 117 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 158 Write 166 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 114 167% 127 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.1 216% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 86%
ST932031 0AS 320GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 74GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 67 68 69 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	28.2% Poor	Read 72.8 Write 73.3 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 67.6 83% 62.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 28%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB 23,482 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 10GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 2.2 1.2 2.8 3.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	6.71% Terrible	Read 21.8 Write 5.7 Mixed 11 SusWrite 3.4 12% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 2.3 114% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.71% Great: 19%
CT500MX5 00SSD1 500GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 441GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 30 30 30 30 31 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.8% Good	Read 41.5 Write 41 Mixed 41.8 SusWrite 30.6 52% 38.7 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 16 4K Mixed 13.8 1,060% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 12.6 DQ Write 19.4 DQ Mixed 14.5 1,200% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB 1,972 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.4% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	191x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	47x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $75Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	8x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	10x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 74%, 7,519 samples	8x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $1,200

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16