HP HPE-480uk

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP HPE-480uk (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2A9C
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120105
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '21 at 16:10
Run Duration	560 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 94.3 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 164 70% 115 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 380 41% 326 Pts	64-Core 380 24% 380 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 2872) 2GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	20.6% Poor	Lighting 23.4 Reflection 26.2 Parallax 31.9 19% 27.2 fps	MRender 32.5 Gravity 30.1 Splatting 25 24% 29.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M550 256GB-$152 8,333 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 153 99 70 78 78 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46% Average	Read 230 Write 231 Mixed 209 SusWrite 106 44% 194 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 45.1 4K Mixed 19.3 70% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 167 134% 189 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 113%
Crucial M550 256GB-$152 8,333 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 35GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 180 186 188 189 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.1% Above average	Read 230 Write 231 Mixed 206 SusWrite 178 48% 211 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 46.9 4K Mixed 20 72% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 167 134% 188 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 113%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 32GB free Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 64 65 68 67 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 53 Write 52.6 Mixed 37.5 SusWrite 66.1 38% 52.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 60%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 9GB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 37 37 38 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Read 62.7 Write 88.4 Mixed 76.7 SusWrite 38.1 50% 66.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 0.6 226% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 808GB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 45 44 45 46 47 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	42.2% Average	Read 99.9 Write 99.9 Mixed 76.2 SusWrite 45.9 60% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.5 166% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 97%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 29GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 31.3 Mixed 9.9 18% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.9 62% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 39%
WD 10EADS External 1TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 19GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 31 Write 24.2 Mixed 23.6 SusWrite 18.4 32% 24.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 21%
Seagate Expansion Desk 1TB 564 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 536GB free, PID 3320 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 61 60 59 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 97.7 Write 96.2 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 59.5 102% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 71%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 2,296 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 15GB free, PID 558a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.2 6 6.4 6.2 5.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	8.19% Terrible	Read 30.7 Write 6 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 6 14% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.9 62% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.19% Great: 32%
Mass Storage Device 120GB 1,006 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 5GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 33.1 Write 25.2 Mixed 26.9 SusWrite 18.8 34% 26 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 6 480% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 70%
CT500MX5 00SSD1 500GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 376GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 16 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.4% Above average	Read 31.2 Write 23.6 Mixed 26.2 SusWrite 16.7 32% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 12.9 4K Mixed 11.8 880% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 12.7 DQ Write 15.1 DQ Mixed 14.1 1,040% 14 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CE80CE80 M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 12.7 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 12.4 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 58.9 68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 24: 2R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
24%	21%	48	236	158	60	23"	1920 1080	HWP3031 HP 23xi

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical HPE-480uk Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP HPE-480uk

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	2x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
Ultra 120GBSanDiskBench 38%, 552 samples	2x
240GB SSD 240GB3Bench 64%, 3,846 samples	1x
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $190Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5673FH0-CH9 AD80AD80 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 AD80AD80 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 12GBCE80CE80Bench 36%, 2 samples	1x
M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBCE80CE80Bench 32%, 5 samples	1x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 1x2GBCE80CE80Bench 21%, 5 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16