Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '18 at 00:21
Run Duration	318 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Memory 96.3 1-Core 109 2-Core 205 80% 137 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 411 53% 398 Pts	64-Core 358 22% 358 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 04FB) CLim: 1310 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: Press Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	52% Above average	Lighting 64.8 Reflection 68.9 Parallax 82.7 53% 72.1 fps	MRender 69 Gravity 62.5 Splatting 56.3 50% 62.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 409GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 140 131 127 127 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 464 Mixed 457 SusWrite 136 87% 390 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 74.6 4K Mixed 48.2 158% 53.4 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 268 208% 279 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 EVO mSAT 500GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 464GB free Firmware: RVT4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 196 188 184 185 187 MB/s Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	77.8% Very good	Read 261 Write 248 Mixed 243 SusWrite 192 53% 236 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 74.5 4K Mixed 46 153% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 66.3 80% 140 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 122%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$194 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 3.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 142 135 132 133 134 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Read 162 Write 159 Mixed 106 SusWrite 138 104% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1 206% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 98%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB 6,863 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 202GB free Firmware: 04.05G04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 105 101 100 101 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 145 Write 133 Mixed 97.3 SusWrite 103 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1.3 255% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 80%
WD VelociRaptor 250GB-$35 3,015 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 186GB free Firmware: 04.06A00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 163 163 164 162 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 157 Mixed 122 SusWrite 163 114% 155 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 1.6 342% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 111%
WD WD740GD-00FLA2 74GB 1,363 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 69GB free Firmware: 27.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 68 69 68 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 67.5 Write 71 Mixed 38 SusWrite 68.4 45% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.2 210% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 39%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 3TB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 96 92 91 93 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 49 Write 109 Mixed 54 SusWrite 94.8 112% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.5 207% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 76%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB 639 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 15GB free, PID 6362 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 13.3 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 13.5 22% 18.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 3.3 180% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 18%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 713 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2.5TB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 18 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 21.8 Mixed 22 SusWrite 18.8 31% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 70%
ASMT 2105 250GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 35GB free, PID 0322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 116 111 107 106 108 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	276% Outstanding	Read 304 Write 313 Mixed 264 SusWrite 113 328% 248 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 65.1 4K Mixed 36.6 3,568% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 30.5 DQ Write 77.6 DQ Mixed 38.3 4,055% 48.8 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 276% Great: 276%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 8GB 6,342 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 4GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.6 3.9 3.2 5.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	5.55% Terrible	Read 21.8 Write 3.8 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 3.8 7% 7.8 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 25% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 5.55% Great: 14%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 11GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 10 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 38.3 Write 13.5 Mixed 19 SusWrite 10.8 24% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 2.7 179% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 39%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 146 146 147 148 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 155 Write 158 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 148 176% 132 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.2 220% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 86%
ST932031 0AS 320GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 18GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 45 46 46 46 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Read 82.8 Write 79.5 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 45.5 80% 61.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 28%
ASMT 2115 1TB 4,577 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 572GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 18 19 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 20.5 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 18.7 29% 22.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 120% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 167%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB 1,972 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1800 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	65.1% Good	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 20.5 63% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 20 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 20.5 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 52.9 76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	192x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	47x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	10x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 74%, 7,519 samples	8x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $1,060

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16