Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics82.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateMar 02 '19 at 12:29
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$163
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 259
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 704
74% 591 Pts
64-Core 713
44% 713 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.1
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.7% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 112
Parallax 99.8
87% 106 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 96.1
Splatting 86.6
75% 91.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 359 356 358 350 350 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 403
Mixed 239
SusWrite 363
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 33.4
129% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 161
160% 259 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 114%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
353GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2135 692 617 618 620 620 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 2,181
Write 1,812
Mixed 1,213
SusWrite 884
340% 1,523 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 86.9
294% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,075
DQ Write 964
DQ Mixed 1,022
766% 1,021 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 278%
Great: 340%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 500GB
443GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 431 452 424 390 387 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 501
Write 423
Mixed 393
SusWrite 421
322% 435 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 51.1
9,110% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 294
2,898% 340 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 94%
WDC WD50 03AZEX-00MK2A0 500GB
356GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 137 137 137 138 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.4% Good
Read 160
Write 151
Mixed 124
SusWrite 135
192% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
128% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
365GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 137 137 137 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 145
Write 127
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 134
144% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 67%
ST2000DX 001-1NS164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 3.5 0.2 0 0 3.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 121
Write 92.3
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 1.5
86% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.5
244% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 26.7
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 28.1
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 52
77% 52 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $860
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback