Today's hottest deals

Powerspec PowerSpec

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics90.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPowerspec PowerSpec  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z170 Gaming K6
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160817
Uptime3 Days
Run DateAug 25 '17 at 14:21
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 96.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 268
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 740
72% 594 Pts
64-Core 740
46% 740 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 115
Parallax 106
95% 112 fps
MRender 99.1
Gravity 102
Splatting 99.5
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
431GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 353
Write 216
Mixed 213
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 19.8
67% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 66.1
76% 134 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 123%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 498
Write 404
Mixed 407
97% 436 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 30.4
89% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 91.2
DQ Mixed 127
110% 168 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 131%
PNY SSD2SC480G1CS1754D117-533 480GB
170GB free
Firmware: CS111101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 399
Write 394
Mixed 400
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 23
70% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 68.7
107% 201 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 98%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
79GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 354
Write 216
Mixed 215
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 21.8
68% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 68.3
78% 136 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 123%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
930GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 177
Write 164
Mixed 100
181% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.21
74% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
905GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 94.6
Write 85
Mixed 59.4
98% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.36
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 43%
WL2000GS A3272 2TB
541GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.1% Poor
Read 62
Write 70.8
Mixed 60.5
84% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.27
61% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 41%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
106GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 98.6
Write 112
Mixed 98.9
135% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 2.27
4K Mixed 0.26
89% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVRB 0420 F4-3200C16-8GVKB 0420 F4-3200C16-8GVRB 0420 F4-3200C16-8GVKB 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 25.5
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 31.5
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 51.1
78% 51.1 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerSpec Builds (Compare 378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

System: Powerspec PowerSpec

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback