Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME B550M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B550M-K  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210112
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateOct 09 '21 at 12:46
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 118
2-Core 225
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 677
66% 541 Pts
64-Core 891
55% 891 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
MSI(1462 3802) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.5% Average
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 57
Parallax 49.3
46% 54.3 fps
MRender 42.8
Gravity 51.1
Splatting 46.7
38% 46.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E12-256G-PHISON-SSD-B3-BB1 256GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 276 260 263 264 264 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 703
Write 468
Mixed 341
SusWrite 268
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 53.5
176% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 700
DQ Write 508
DQ Mixed 41.5
183% 416 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 126%
Great: 187%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$47
311GB free
Firmware: P2CR031 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 982 1013 695 176 178 175 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,032
Write 1,063
Mixed 965
SusWrite 536
202% 899 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 63.6
214% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 511
DQ Mixed 509
368% 469 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 161%
Great: 253%
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
438GB free
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 431 436 437 446 445 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 501
Write 444
Mixed 393
SusWrite 436
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 28.3
124% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 45.2
102% 207 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
591GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 90 90 88 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 84.8
Write 86.5
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 89.8
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 62%
ST1000DX 001-1CM162 1TB
864GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 39.3
Mixed 30.9
38% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 2
252% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 72%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
177GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 39
Write 37.7
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 4.5
35% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 67%
ST350082 0AS 500GB
441GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 6.2
Mixed 10
SusWrite 34.3
26% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 30.7
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.9
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27A3 ASUS PB278
Typical PRIME B550M-K Builds (Compare 2,921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B550M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $406
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback