Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF  (all builds)
Memory18.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181204
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 22:24
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User LCA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 86.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 284
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 951
90% 745 Pts
64-Core 1,479
92% 1,479 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 109% Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
547GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1284 1145 1098 1126 999 1079 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,456
Write 1,812
Mixed 1,444
SusWrite 1,122
381% 1,708 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 47.7
178% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,028
DQ Write 53.2
DQ Mixed 87.8
178% 390 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 245%
Great: 372%
Corsair Force LE SSD 960GB
4GB free
Firmware: SAFC12.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 492
Write 492
Mixed 388
102% 457 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 37.9
140% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 207
188% 288 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 107%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 208
Write 213
Mixed 103
129% 175 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 1.7
384% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 138%
WD Purple Surveillance 6TB (2017)-$113
415GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 89 87 90 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 88.9
Write 97.4
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 89.9
63% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 99%
ST350082 0AS 500GB
434GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 109 104 108 94 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 104
Write 51.7
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 104
102% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 41%
WDC WD25 00JS-00SGB0 250GB
120GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 59.5
Write 51.5
Mixed 40.5
62% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
115% 1.33 MB/s
ST310005 28AS 1TB
824GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 113
Write 108
Mixed 74.2
123% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 48%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00V1A0 500GB
45GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 89.1
Write 89.7
Mixed 65.9
103% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C15D4/8G 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 KHX2666C15D4/8G 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.4
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 22.9
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,042
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback