Today's hottest deals

Asus SABERTOOTH Z77

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z77  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120605
Uptime17.4 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '21 at 01:50
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 140
56% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 387
42% 335 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.5% Below average
Lighting 42.2
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 39.5
34% 34.2 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 31.2
29% 35.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE SSD 960GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFC12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 185 215 247 105 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 349
Write 366
Mixed 275
SusWrite 167
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 23.2
72% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 167
161% 254 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 107%
Intel X25-M 160GB
40GB free
Firmware: 2CV102HD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 101 100 103 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 216
Write 95.3
Mixed 112
SusWrite 98.6
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 8.2
40% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 86.7
DQ Mixed 79.3
70% 107 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 46%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 119 112 131 118 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 86.3
Write 89
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 121
63% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST32000645NS 2TB-$251
53GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 112 109 111 110 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 89.8
Write 38.8
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 110
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST3500320NS 500GB-$100
86GB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 80 81 82 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
39% Below average
Read 54.3
Write 12.9
Mixed 41.8
SusWrite 81.2
35% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39%
Great: 61%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$28
168GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 75 76 75 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41% Average
Read 67.5
Write 46.3
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 74.9
45% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
274GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 80 80 80 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 47.8
Write 53
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 80.1
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 101%
StoreJet Transcend 500GB
404GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 57 58 33 59 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 46.3
Write 34.3
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 52.7
60% 44 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
93% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 44%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE-2 64GB
31GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 45 45 49 66 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 83.5
Write 24
Mixed 20
SusWrite 51.4
52% 44.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.4
96% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 8.4
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z77 Builds (Compare 2,609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z77 - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback