Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory50.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200615
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateDec 02 '21 at 22:28
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$177
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 68.4
1-Core 146
2-Core 291
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 980
93% 769 Pts
64-Core 1,470
91% 1,470 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$150
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.11.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 146
Parallax 201
108% 160 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 143
Splatting 97.7
96% 120 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 924 685 658 697 601 671 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,005
Write 1,548
Mixed 1,699
SusWrite 706
333% 1,490 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 71
246% 91.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,237
DQ Write 814
DQ Mixed 484
507% 845 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 245%
Great: 288%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 187 192 188 174 182 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 179
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 183
106% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 100%
Great: 130%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 199 202 203 186 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 243
Write 190
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 196
125% 172 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 126%
Great: 130%
WDC WD50 03AZEX-00MK2A0 500GB
329GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.9 4 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.7% Below average
Read 158
Write 162
Mixed 119
SusWrite 6.7
142% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
145% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 60%
Generic USB3.0 Device 160GB
106GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 38 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.6% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 8.7
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 38.8
28% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 23%
TOSHIBA HDWF180 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42% Average
Read 156
Write 172
Mixed 96
SusWrite 5.8
136% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.6
224% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42%
Great: 79%
ST316082 7AS 160GB
79GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 34 34 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.1% Very poor
Read 37.4
Write 37.6
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 34.8
47% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.87 MB/s
Hitachi HDT721064SLA360 640GB
596GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 35 35 37 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.5% Poor
Read 98.8
Write 90.1
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 35.9
87% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.2 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.5
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 26.5
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 9,630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $961
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback