Asus Maximus IV GENE-Z

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV GENE-Z  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '15 at 15:47
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 224
69% 157 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 645
66% 532 Pts
64-Core 649
40% 649 Pts
Poor: 56% Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B E210) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.7% Poor
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 49.5
30% 37.7 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 37.2
Splatting 34.2
27% 32.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 96.4
Write 87.9
Mixed 86.3
68% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.26
71% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 68%
Generic USB3.0 Device 160GB
68GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.7% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 55.7
Mixed 50.9
68% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.2
42% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 23%
Typical Maximus IV GENE-Z Builds (Compare 436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV GENE-Z - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback