HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '19 at 15:54
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 172
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 371
49% 370 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.16
4% 4.32 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 4.74 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 427 433 433 430 439 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 431
Mixed 412
SusWrite 431
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 27.2
113% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 47.8
99% 198 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
45GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 104 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 98.9
Write 49.4
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 103
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 112%
Adata HC660 2TB
477GB free
Firmware: 9201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 73 71 72 68 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 52.3
Write 76.7
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 70.4
53% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.2
163% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.8F1 Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback