HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '19 at 14:51
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 199
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 381
51% 379 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.09
4% 4.29 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 6.17
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 391 404 403 403 400 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 422
Write 392
Mixed 371
SusWrite 401
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 29.7
136% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 47.6
101% 203 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 100%
Adata HC660 2TB
477GB free
Firmware: 9201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 72 75 73 70 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 35.3
Write 101
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 70.5
56% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.3
154% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.8F1 Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.6% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback