Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H61M-DS2 3.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-DS2 3.0  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130225
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateSep 29 '20 at 09:09
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 515
56% 441 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.4% Good
Lighting 78.9
Reflection 82.3
Parallax 79.6
64% 80.2 fps
MRender 78.9
Gravity 72.9
Splatting 66
59% 72.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ABA100V 1TB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU2OA720
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 116 117 104 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 132
Write 130
Mixed 24
SusWrite 105
71% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 85%
Adata HC660 2TB
334GB free
Firmware: 9201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 29 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 27.8
Write 28.7
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 29.7
21% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.5
152% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Transcend TS1GLK64V6H 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 17.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-DS2 3.0 Builds (Compare 732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-DS2 3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback