Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170908
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 03 '17 at 07:07
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 237
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 885
80% 674 Pts
64-Core 1,278
79% 1,278 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31% Below average
Lighting 39
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 35.8
32% 35 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 36.4
Splatting 34.8
30% 36.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme TS256GMTE850 256GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C2.3.13 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,779
Write 1,070
Mixed 1,322
308% 1,390 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 27
150% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 132
122% 186 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 190%
Great: 209%
Adata HC660 2TB
913GB free
Firmware: 9201
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 120
Write 111
Mixed 75.8
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.18
4K Write 4.26
4K Mixed 0.49
182% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 66%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
904GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 99.9
Write 106
Mixed 101
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.25
101% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
96GB free
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 77.8
Write 74.9
Mixed 65.3
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.51
117% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
4GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 86.9
Mixed 88.4
66% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.37
82% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 70%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
856GB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 122
Write 109
Mixed 87.1
132% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.15
73% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
385GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 88.8
Write 62.3
Mixed 80.9
96% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.15
55% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 44%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 1TB
50GB free, PID 01de
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 54.7
Write 54.5
Mixed 41.2
63% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.1% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 24.7
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 23.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 685 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,077
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback