Dell Latitude E6530

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E6530  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 07Y85M
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '18 at 09:38
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 95
2-Core 174
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 225
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Dell(1028 0535) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 4.12
Parallax 3.06
0% 2.43 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 8.3
5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 4%
Nvidia NVS 5200M
Dell(1028 1535) 1GB
CLim: 672 MHz, MLim: 784 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 387.95
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
3.02% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.73
Parallax 3.41
3% 4.08 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 0.13
2% 3.35 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.02%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
515GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 57 64 62 73 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 80.6
Write 77
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 56.9
48% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 57%
JMicron Generic DISK00 320GB
128GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 12 5.6 5.6 24 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
3.82% Terrible
Read 5
Write 4.7
Mixed 5
SusWrite 12.8
10% 6.88 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.82%
Great: 44%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 200GB
126GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 35 32 20 15 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.8% Very poor
Read 45
Write 48.4
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 25.9
46% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6530 Builds (Compare 530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback