Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2160-$47 4,697 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 69.3 1-Core 19.6 2-Core 31.8 31% 40.2 Pts	4-Core 32 8-Core 35.6 4% 33.8 Pts	64-Core 39.1 2% 39.1 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT 8,099 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8243) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.83% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 5.1 Parallax 0.9 2% 2.6 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2.8 2% 3.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.83% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD300LJ 300GB-$25 1,072 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZT100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 30 31 22 33 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 25 Write 25 Mixed 10.8 SusWrite 26.9 16% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 101% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 34%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 200GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 113GB free, PID a001 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 25 25 24 25 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.7% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 25 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 24.7 33% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.93 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	27x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	19x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $59Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	14x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	17x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	10x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	8x

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $190