Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T7700-$100 1,898 User benchmarks, average bench 37% U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 65.3 1-Core 26.6 2-Core 44.8 33% 45.6 Pts	4-Core 50.7 8-Core 50.7 7% 50.7 Pts	64-Core 52.2 3% 52.2 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 487 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 30C5) 256MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.73% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 3.96 Parallax 0.88 0% 1.63 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 4.35 2% 2.25 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.73% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$33 2,800 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 25 38 41 39 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Read 50.2 Write 41.8 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 35.1 28% 37.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 82% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 41%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 200GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 60GB free, PID a001 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 19 21 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.3% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 18.8 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 19.6 28% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.2 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM