Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7-OP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive390% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7-OP  (all builds)
Memory45.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime30.9 Days
Run DateApr 16 '20 at 20:43
Run Duration1068 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 96.9
1-Core 137
2-Core 256
92% 163 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 806
73% 615 Pts
64-Core 1,117
69% 1,117 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
PNY(196E 1301) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 4165 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 140
Parallax 146
123% 146 fps
MRender 213
Gravity 145
Splatting 115
124% 158 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 119%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$300
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1929 2025 2034 2079 2045 1900 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
390% Outstanding
Read 2,711
Write 2175
Mixed 1,251
SusWrite 2002
455% 2,035 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 88.7
314% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,519
DQ Write 1,305
DQ Mixed 1,347
1,027% 1,390 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 390%
Great: 425%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2486 2487 2489 1746 1580 1547 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
408% Outstanding
Read 2,638
Write 2,483
Mixed 1,873
SusWrite 2,056
508% 2,262 MB/s
4K Read 70.6
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 103
354% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1630
DQ Write 1,420
DQ Mixed 1,495
1,129% 1,515 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 408%
Great: 431%
Seagate ST8000AS0003-2HH188 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 158 159 167 169 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 110
Write 144
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 162
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
182% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 93%
Samsung HN-M101MBB 1TB-$45
45GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 93 93 93 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 38
Write 17.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 91.6
33% 44.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 59%
JMicron Generic DISK00 320GB
54GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 105
Write 105
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 103
122% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 44%
JMicron Generic DISK02 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 79 80 79 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 76.3
Write 77.3
Mixed 66
SusWrite 79.4
102% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 65%
JMicron Generic DISK01 2TB
571GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 91.5
Write 37
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 103
95% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR64GX4M4C3466C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 36.2
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 46.6
SC Mixed 32.6
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 50.8
79% 50.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 113%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7-OP Builds (Compare 316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7-OP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $729
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback