Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171011
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateSep 22 '18 at 23:23
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 158
2-Core 318
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 628
8-Core 993
100% 810 Pts
64-Core 1,278
79% 1,278 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 107%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 194
Parallax 180
142% 183 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 174
Splatting 123
113% 139 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$139
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 635 305 301 295 292 287 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,923
Write 1,322
Mixed 662
SusWrite 352
235% 1,065 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 59.9
247% 94.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,085
DQ Write 974
DQ Mixed 973
745% 1,010 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 219%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
11GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 482
Write 455
Mixed 379
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 58.9
201% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 359
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
USB3.0 60GB
51GB free
Firmware: 8105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 61 61 61 60 61 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.2% Below average
Read 173
Write 64.8
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 60.2
21% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 19.1
67% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 68.4
DQ Write 54.5
DQ Mixed 54
42% 59 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 45%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 140
Write 147
Mixed 96
SusWrite 114
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 112%
H/W DISK 1 500GB
450GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 96 93 95 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 122
Write 117
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 94.3
133% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 45%
H/W DISK 2 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.6 1.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 129
Write 101
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 0.9
87% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 59%
H/W DISK 3 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 96 93 94 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 118
Write 126
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 94
122% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 39%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$171
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 25.3
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 28.6
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 49.5
81% 49.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO Builds (Compare 3,719 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $990
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback