HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1497
Memory	1.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120620
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '19 at 21:48
Run Duration	287 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$189 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 90 1-Core 89 2-Core 172 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 410 44% 348 Pts	64-Core 424 26% 424 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375D) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Lighting 18.6 Reflection 15.3 Parallax 18.1 15% 17.4 fps	MRender 16 Gravity 18.9 Splatting 19.9 15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB 6,787 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 756GB free (System drive) Firmware: PT0D Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 120 Write 123 Mixed 69 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.1 61% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 84%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9401 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 28.6 Write 25.3 Mixed 23.8 19% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.6 208% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 87%
WL2000GS A6472E 2TB 341GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 31.5 Write 22.8 Mixed 23.5 32% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 118% 1.37 MB/s

H/W DISK 1 2TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 754GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 29.8 Write 21.8 Mixed 23.2 31% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 49%
H/W DISK 2 2TB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 273GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 32.1 Write 23.5 Mixed 24.5 33% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 41%
H/W DISK 3 2TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 641GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1 1.1 1.2 1 1.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.15% Terrible	Read 30.8 Write 22.3 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 1 24% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.15% Great: 44%
H/W DISK 4 2TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 365GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.94% Terrible	Read 30.7 Write 23.5 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 0 24% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 8.94% Great: 57%
TRUSTED Mass Storage 17.5TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 13TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 8.3 8.3 8.1 8.3 8.9 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.4% Very poor	Read 17.5 Write 15.7 Mixed 11.2 SusWrite 8.3 17% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.1 116% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 14%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.1 8.1 8 8.1 8.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 23.5 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 8.1 27% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 59%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 900GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 23 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 0 23% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 46%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 52GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1 1 1.3 1 1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 23.5 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 1.1 24% 19.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Performance DDR3 1600 C9 3x2GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.9% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 11.7 36% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 11.3 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 1,615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	611x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	252x
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	203x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	988x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	109x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	97x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	52x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	35x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	20x

RAM
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	19x
8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 2x2GBMicronBench 46%, 1,198 samples	18x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16