Intel DH55TC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemINTEL_ DH55TC__
MotherboardIntel DH55TC  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091119
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 07 '16 at 00:07
Run Duration981 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 94.7
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 154
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 382
40% 322 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770
Sapphire(174B E144) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 12.1
12% 12.5 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 12.1
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 120GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.25 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 164
Write 84.9
Mixed 98.6
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 9.18
64% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 82.2
DQ Mixed 6.61
18% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 55%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
58GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 61.3
Write 71.9
Mixed 26.2
39% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.27
80% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 60%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
32GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 87.2
Write 79.6
Mixed 17.4
44% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.22
60% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 54%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$66
18GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 79.5
Write 79.9
Mixed 29.1
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.15
76% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
30GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 106
Write 91.7
Mixed 54
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.28
101% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 62%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
13GB free
Firmware: GM4OA52A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 74
Write 66.5
Mixed 13.6
37% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.24
84% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 51%
Imation Nano 8GB
3GB free, PID 04a3
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
6.95% Terrible
Read 20.6
Write 6.31
Mixed 8.49
12% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.21
4K Write 0.44
4K Mixed 0.007
35% 1.89 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.95%
Great: 7%
RIM BlackBerry 4GB
1GB free, PID null
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.91% Terrible
Read 12.6
Write 6.16
Mixed 7.76
10% 8.83 MB/s
4K Read 2.76
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
12% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.91%
Great: 5%
RIM BlackBerry SD 8GB
0GB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
2% Terrible
Read 8.26
Write 1.99
Mixed 3.23
5% 4.49 MB/s
4K Read 1.49
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.004
6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905458-009.A00LF 9905458-009.A00LF Corsair CMZ4GX3M2A1600C9 Corsair CMZ4GX3M2A1600C9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.9% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 13.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DH55TC Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DH55TC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback