Intel DH55TC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemINTEL_ DH55TC__
MotherboardIntel DH55TC  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091119
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateApr 24 '16 at 22:23
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 83.6
1-Core 53.5
2-Core 99.7
51% 78.9 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 288
28% 229 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770
Sapphire(174B E144) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 11
Parallax 12.5
12% 12.9 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 12.5
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 120GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.25 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 141
Write 82
Mixed 97
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 6.71
71% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 20.8
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 7.25
16% 32.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 55%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
43GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 44.2
Write 89.6
Mixed 27.2
39% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.32
94% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 60%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
18GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 67.5
Write 81
Mixed 11.6
39% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.16
75% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 67%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
14GB free
Firmware: GM4OA52A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 61.6
Write 58.7
Mixed 21.5
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.33
92% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
14GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 131
Write 104
Mixed 47.6
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.23
82% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905458-009.A00LF 9905458-009.A00LF Corsair CMZ4GX3M2A1600C9 Corsair CMZ4GX3M2A1600C9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.1% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DH55TC Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DH55TC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback