Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	45% Average	Memory 63.5 1-Core 91.7 2-Core 103 54% 86 Pts	4-Core 154 8-Core 160 21% 157 Pts	64-Core 168 10% 168 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Zotac(19DA 5527) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.76 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44% Average	Lighting 53.9 Reflection 52.7 Parallax 51.7 44% 52.8 fps	MRender 68.6 Gravity 50.4 Splatting 46.3 44% 55.1 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$20 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900P13 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 228 Write 190 Mixed 184 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 25.3 95% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 146 124% 181 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 87%
Imation Nano 8GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 04a3 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 6.6 6.5 5.6 6.6 6.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	5.25% Terrible	Read 18.4 Write 3.7 Mixed 2.2 SusWrite 6.1 8% 7.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.25% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 27,024 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 11.4 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 5.1 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2,038x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,354x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	723x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87