Today's hottest deals

MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '18 at 06:22
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 223
83% 144 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 700
70% 569 Pts
64-Core 896
55% 896 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2780 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 191
Reflection 207
Parallax 190
156% 196 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 191
Splatting 133
124% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SM2280S3G2240G 240GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.R Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 524
Write 264
Mixed 391
87% 393 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 12.5
106% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 31.2
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 12.5
25% 48.2 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 97%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
66GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 477
Write 199
Mixed 261
68% 312 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 19.4
105% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 54
71% 125 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 85%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
40GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 515
Write 194
Mixed 251
70% 320 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 15.9
107% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 44.3
72% 136 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 85%
ST4000DM 000-2AE166 4TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 179
Write 154
Mixed 112
182% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.27
70% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 65%
WDC WD40 PURX-64NZ6Y0 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 108
Write 106
Mixed 80.9
124% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.21
4K Mixed 0.19
83% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 54%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 101
Write 96.1
Mixed 72.1
113% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.16
75% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 48%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 96.3
Write 100
Mixed 74.6
115% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.15
62% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 48%
ST350082 0AS 500GB
121GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 70.9
Write 74.5
Mixed 58.2
87% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
67% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB-$182
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 36.6
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 22.2
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 102%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback