Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 347 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Memory 69 1-Core 38.7 2-Core 56 38% 54.6 Pts	4-Core 68.1 8-Core 69.1 9% 68.6 Pts	64-Core 81 5% 81 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800M GTX 100 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Dell(1028 019C) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	8.08% Terrible	Lighting 12.3 Reflection 6.65 Parallax 2.31 10% 7.09 fps	MRender 6.19 Gravity 5.33 Splatting 4.61 4% 5.38 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.08% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ARRAY 400GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 280GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 112 Write 92.3 Mixed 60.9 66% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.53 121% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4.2 13% 4.43 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.3 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Extreme X9000IntelBench 40%, 347 samples	4x
Core2 Duo T9300Intel $70Bench 38%, 3,287 samples	3x
Core2 Duo T7500Intel $90Bench 35%, 4,281 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 9800M GTXNvidiaBench 6%, 100 samples	4x
GeForce 8700M GTNvidiaBench 2%, 317 samples	4x
GeForce 8800M GTXNvidiaBench 5%, 138 samples	3x

SSD
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $113Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	2x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $113